Ave Maria!
Last Sunday after Pentecost
25 November AD 2012
Ordinary of the Mass
Mass Text - Latin
Mass Text - English
“When you shall see the abomination of
desolation ... standing in the holy place:
he that readeth, let him understand....”
This is one of the few times in Sacred
Scripture where our Lord calls us to study and understand a specific phrase He
uses: “he that readeth, let him understand.” So, what is this “abomination of
desolation”? When will it take place? And who will see it?
Our Lord referred to the Book of Daniel,
where the abomination is referred to three times.
Daniel is an apocalyptic book of the Old Testament, and like the Apocalypse at
the end of the New Testament, it is difficult or nearly impossible to pin down
the exact time and location that an event is to take place. In apocalyptic
literature, the same name or description may be assigned to an event in the
distant past, the far future, and anywhere in between. Likewise, it is often
difficult to place the event between heaven and hell. It is often appropriate
for people in different times and places to consider the same apocalyptic event
as belonging to their times and places. Our Lord seems to have intended to
speak in this apocalyptic manner. We can look to history and to Scripture and
get some idea of what He was saying.
In history we think we know that Daniel
the Prophet was referring to the desecration of the Temple in Jerusalem by the
Seleucid King Antiochus IV Epiphanes. Antiochus set up a statue of Zeus in the
Temple and sacrificed unclean animals in worship of it—un-kosher pigs. The
First Book of Machabees reports the same event in its first chapter:
On the fifteenth day of the month
Casleu, in the hundred and forty-fifth year, king Antiochus set up the
abominable idol of desolation upon the altar of God, and they built
altars throughout all the cities of Juda round about.... And they cut
in pieces, and burnt with fire the books of the law of God: And every
one with whom the books of the testament of the Lord were found, and
whosoever observed the law of the Lord, they put to death, according to
the edict of the king.
Antiochus was more than a little
“off”—claiming to be God, and issuing coins whose inscriptions referred to him
as “Θεὸς Ἐπιφανής—Theos Epiphanes—manifest god.” You can read about the
overthrow of this “manifest ‘god’” in the Books of Machabees.
Epiphanes was not alone in his attempt
to usurp the Temple. Around AD 40, the mad Roman Emperor, Caligula, planned to
have himself worshipped as the incarnation of Zeus, but this was foiled by his
assassination. Under Titus there was a sort of worship of the standards of the
Roman government. And, then in 140 AD the Emperor Hadrian planned to rebuild
the Temple and have a statue of Jupiter worshipped there—Hadrian’s plans may
well have caused the last Jewish rebellion against the Romans. Around 690 AD
the Moslems erected the Dome of the Rock on the site of the Temple, as a
monument to the supposed “Night Journey to Heaven,” claimed to have been made by
Mohammed.—this continues to be a source of irritation to the Jewish people in
modern day Jerusalem.
At least one Protestant scholar has
suggested that our Lord was referring to His own rejection by the Jewish people
and crucifixion by the Romans.
Some Modernists might agree, but from the Catholic perspective this seems wrong,
for the Sacrifice of the Cross, and the Sacrifice of the Mass (which re-presents
the Cross in time and in place) is anything but desolation; being the font of
all graces. And, from the context of the Gospels, it is pretty clear that we
are talking about the destruction of Jerusalem, or even the destruction of the
world itself!
Jerusalem was indeed destroyed in AD 70
by the Romans Vespasian and Titus. Jesus’ prediction was fulfilled, nearly
literally: “the days will come in which there shall not be left a stone upon
a stone that shall not be thrown down.” The Romans were very thorough
destroyers. Many of the Christians of Jerusalem, aware of our Lord’s prophecy
of its destruction were able to flee to safety before the Romans completely
surrounded the city. The Jewish historian Josephus describes an incredible
slaughter of those that remained: men, women, children, pregnant women, babes in
arms; a terrible starvation, with some eating leather, hay, or manure; and at
least one case of a woman roasting and eating her baby child.
The end of the world also will come some
day. People in every century thought it might come in their time. I have
always pictured a monk in a very cold monastery, watching the sands pour out of
an hour glass as it neared midnight on December 31st A.D. 999. Certainly, the
invasion of the Huns, the Vikings, and the Moslem hordes, the great revolutions,
and the world wars must have all seemed like the end to those who lived through
them. Perhaps the economic and political collapse of the twenty-first century
will be our “end of the world.”
Far more important, I would suggest, a
true “abomination of desolation” is the loss of the Mass and the Sacraments;
the loss of Christian truth and morality. Yes, I do mean “Masses” celebrated
with clowns, and balloons, people in Halloween costumes, rock music, and
flashing lights—I do mean “Masses” celebrated by “priests” who have lost belief
in the real presence of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist, and who do not understand
the Mass to be one with the Sacrifice of the Cross, or to be anything more than
a Protestant Communion service.
The true “abomination of desolation” is
to be found in the Modernist denial of objective truth, even in what was
explicitly revealed by Christ. The desolation is in the “dialogue” where
every belief and lack of belief are treated as being equally valid—and in the
Modernist “truth” that changes every time a new participant enters or leaves the
“dialogue.” The desolation is in the dialectic; the inclination to
socialism and Marxism found at the highest levels of the Modernist church.
And, along with the desolation of
subjective “truth” there is the abomination of subjective morality.
Allegedly Catholic universities boast of having academic “dialogue” about
abortion, contraception, divorce, and the perversion of marriage. Priests
appear in pornographic pictures.
And superiors are rewarded for covering up the scandals under their authority.
In the year 70, the Christians of
Jerusalem were able to flee the Romans before the City’s destruction. It might
seem that in our twenty-first century there is nowhere to flee. A few people
will move to Idaho and Montana, grow their own crops and homeschool their
children—more power to them—but that is impractical for most people.
Modern day Catholics must flee by
remaining in place. (“Bugging‑in” rather than “Bugging‑out.”) Where we have
the Mass and Sacraments, we must not tolerate any degree of innovation or
irreverence. Where there is no Mass, we will make do with the Rosary. Baptism
and Matrimony cannot be taken away. The Catholic Church in Japan survived
underground, persecuted, and with no priests for most of the seventeenth,
eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. When priests arrived in the 1850s they
found practicing Catholics who wanted to see pictures of the Blessed Virgin, and
to know who the current Pope was! Needless to say, these surviving Japanese
Catholics had not developed any theories of doctrinal “dialogue” or moral
“relativism.”
Yes, the end of the world will come some
day.—perhaps in our own time, and perhaps not. But it is reasonable to consider
this apocalyptic phrase of our Lord as applying to us, here and now. The
“abomination of desolation” is real—the loss of the Catholic Faith comes to
souls without regard to time or place. Paradoxically, the Faith is often
stronger when it is most difficult to sustain, when the helps and helpers we
take for granted are taken away, when persecution drives it underground and out
of site. The Faith is often strongest when people must cling to It as they
would to precious jewels hidden in a flower pot.
“When you shall see the abomination of
desolation ... standing in the holy place: he that heareth, let him
understand....”
|