Ordinary of the Mass
Mass Text - Latin
Mass Text - English
“Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above,
coming down from the Father of Lights,
with whom there is no change nor shadow
of alteration.
Of His own
will He has begotten us by the word of truth....”
The author of today’s epistle, Saint James, is
believed to have been a blood relative of our Lord—possibly a cousin or
second cousin, the child of Mary of Cleophas, who was related to Mary the
Mother of Jesus. From historical sources we know him to have been among
those who observed the Nazarite vow, living a life of intense penance.
It is clear from his writing that he knows Christianity to be the fulfillment
of what was revealed to the Jewish Nation in the Old Testament. He
refers to Abraham and Isaac, and to the woman Rahab, in his explanation of
justification in chapter two.
The passage we just
read is extremely important for today’s Catholics, and indeed, for anyone
living in the modern world. Fifty years, or so, ago, his words would
have been accepted as a given by all good Catholics, and by many people
outside of the Church. Very few people would have questioned the
unchanging nature of God, and no Catholic would have questioned the origin of
the Catholic Faith in “the Word of Truth,” whom we know to be our Lord
Jesus Christ. It was part of the perennial philosophy that God must be
unchanging and all‑knowing. It was the common belief of Christians
and Jews that God had communicated some of His knowledge to mankind by public
revelation through Moses and the Prophets—it was clear to all Christians
that this process of divine public revelation reached its fulfillment and
conclusion in the revelations of Jesus Christ to His Apostles.
This understanding
of an all-knowing and unchanging God, logically gives way to the concept of objective
truth. If God knows everything, and never changes, objective and
unchanging truth must exist—at least in the mind of God. We human
beings may have difficulty determining what is true—some things may not be
knowable through human investigation—and some times all of the
interested parties may be wrong about what they have investigated. But
none of that difficulty or uncertainty detracts, in any way, from the reality
that objective and unchanging truth exists, even if, in some cases, it
is known only in the mind of God.
But, as Saint James
tells us, “Of His own will [God] has begotten us by the word of
truth....” That is to say that, even though human beings may have
difficulty and be error prone in our investigations of the world around us,
God has intervened through His revelations, to make sure that we know the more
important aspects of His objective truth with absolute certainty.
Throughout history men and women have been able to recognize God’s existence
through their investigation of the world around them, and the use of their
natural human reason, as we read in the Book of Wisdom: “by the
greatness of the beauty, and of the creature, the Creator of them may be seen,
so as to be known thereby.”
Men and women, down
through history, have also done a pretty fair job of knowing the Natural Moral
Law to which all of mankind must be subject in order for societies to
function. The wise thinkers among us have come to recognize that society
simply cannot function if its members go around killing, and stealing, and
cheating, and beating one another. Most societies have also recognized
the duties which they have toward the Creator—even if they have come to know
Him through natural reason alone
But, knowing that
man’s reasoning may not always be complete and correct, God has intervened
in human history so that we may know the truths He wants us to know about Him,
and the way in which He wants us to behave. In Catholic theology, we
refer to “matters of Faith and Morals” which reduce simply to “what God
wants us to know, and “what God wants us to do.”
And again, since we
believe that there is objective truth, at least in the mind of God, we believe
that these things that He has revealed—these “matters of Faith and
Morals”—are part of that objective truth. We use the word
“objective” because they are true for everyone. They are not
“subjective” for they do not depend on the wisdom or logic of any
human subject—they are not matters of opinion or sentiment, for they come to
us from God, who is all-knowing and unchanging, and we have received them
through “His Word of truth.”
This body of divine
revelation and the concept of objective truth were the common patrimony of
Western Civilization for centuries after the time of Christ. To be sure,
there were still occasional squabbles among people who held differing
opinions, but even the squabble was an affirmation of the concept of “objective
truth”—for two people to argue, it must be that each believes that he
is in possession of the truth, and that the opponent is not. Even if
both of them are wrong, they are still contending that there is an objective
truth to the matter at hand.
But around the mid 1600s, there arose a philosophical
movement that questioned, among other things, the way in which we form
judgments about the world around us. Known by the very self serving name
of the “Enlightenment,” this philosophical movement drew many away from
belief in God, and into an intellectual and moral relativism. To the “philosophes”
of the “Enlightenment” there was a great deal of controversy as to what
exactly constituted “reality,” and as to how people could actually know
this “reality.” Most of their thinking was highly subjective, even
to the point of man creating his own “truth,” or joining with others in
“dialectic” or “dialogue” through which they arrived at a common (but
highly impermanent) truth.
This anarchy of
subjective and changeable “truth” culminated in the French Revolution of
1789. A woman would be enthroned as “the goddess of reason” in the
cathedral of Notre Dame, and a bloodbath, henceforth known as “The Terror”
(la Terreur), would ensue in the names of “liberty, equality, and
fraternity” as Frenchmen were systematically deprived of all three—not to
mention, of course, their heads.
Yet, in spite of
this terrible carnage, the ideas of the “Enlightenment” would hold a
certain fascination for the thinkers of Western Civilization, including even
some Catholics. Less than a hundred years later, the thinking of the “philosophes”
was condemned by Pope Pius IX in a “Syllabus of Errors,” published on
the feast of the Immaculate Conception in 1864.
Another such Syllabus preceded Pope Saint Pius X’ encyclical, Pascendi,
condemning Modernism (in 1907 and 1908, respectively).
Perhaps the most frightening thing was that while the earlier Pope Pius
condemned mostly state interference in matters proper to the Church, the
Modernism condemned by Saint Pius X was more a matter of relativistic
opinions among the Catholic clergy about matters of the Catholic Faith.
Those seeking positions within the Church were required to take an Oath
Against Modernism.
But then, during
the intellectual upheaval of the 1960s, when objective reality was needed more
than ever, the Second Vatican Council abolished the Oath Against Modernism and
issued the document Gaudium et spes, which was hailed as a
“counter-syllabus” to those issued by Popes Pius IX and X.
A conscious effort was to be made to approach the world through the errors of
modern philosophy—the errors of the “Enlightenment,” the Revolution,
and “the Terror.”
It should surprise no one that this “counter
syllabus” ushered in a period of doctrinal and moral confusion never before
seen in the Church or in Civil Society. Abandoning the teaching of Saint
James about the unchanging and unalterable “Father of Lights” and His
begetting of “us by His Word of Truth” has led to the chaos prophesied by
Saint Paul:
There shall be a time when
they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own lusts they
will heap up to them selves teachers, having itching ears, and will turn away
their hearing from the truth, but will be turned unto fables (2 Timothy
4: 3-4).
The remedy is
simple: as Catholics and as citizens we must resist Modernism in both
Church and State. There is an unchanging God—His word is
objective truth, valid for all men and women. We must categorically
resist those who deny His existence, or deny the objective validity of His
doctrinal and moral instructions to us through His Word. We must not
allow ourselves to have those “itching ears” which seek after those rulers
“according to our own lusts.” We must not turn away from
truth to pursue “fables.”
As Catholics and as
citizens we must discipline ourselves to seek after the truly good, and to
avoid what is evil even though it may be superficially attractive.
Where do we find
the “truly good”? We merely look to Saint James’ words today:
“Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above,
coming down from the Father of Lights,
with whom there is no change nor shadow of alteration.
Of His own will He has begotten us by the word of truth....”