In
the year 431, just about a century after Christianity became legal in
the empire, an ecumenical council was held in Ephesus, the city in
modern day Turkey where the Blessed Virgin Mary lived under the care
of Saint John the Apostle. An ecumenical council is one
attended by bishops and their representatives from all over the
Church. The council at Ephesus hosted over 200 bishops, and was
presided over by Saint Cyril of Alexandria as the personal
representative of Pope Saint Celestine I. The primary
reason for the council was a heresy being taught by Nestorius, the
bishop of Constantinople, which claimed that the human and divine
natures of Christ could not be united in the same person—at
most, the human Christ might carry the divinity of God around in
himself in a sort of symbiotic relationship. Nestorius had the
support of the Emperor Theodosius II, and was thus a powerful
threat to the Catholic faith, which held that God and man were united
in the person of Jesus Christ.
Writing
just a few years after the council, Pope Saint Leo the Great
expressed the Catholic doctrine:
The
Word of God, Himself God, the Son of God who “in the beginning
was with God,” through whom “all things were made”
and “without” whom “was nothing made (John 1:1-3),”
with the purpose of delivering man from eternal death, became man: so
bending Himself to take on Him our humility without decrease in His
own majesty, that remaining what He was and assuming what He was not,
He might unite the true form of a slave to that form in which He is
equal to God the Father, and join both natures together by such a
compact that the lower should not be swallowed up in its exaltation
nor the higher impaired by its new associate. Without detriment
therefore to the properties of either substance which then came
together in one person, majesty took on humility, strength weakness,
eternity mortality: and for the paying off of the debt, belonging to
our condition, inviolable nature was united with possible nature, and
true God and true man were combined to form one Lord, so that, as
suited the needs of our case, one and the same Mediator between God
and men, the Man Christ Jesus, could both die with the one and rise
again with the other.
One
of the consequences of Nestorius' heresy, if it had been accepted,
would be to deny the Blessed Virgin her traditional title of
Θεοτόκος
(Theotokos) or Mother of God, as the Greek is translated.
Theotokos means “God bearer,” and if Christ were
nothing more than a God-bearing man it would make little sense to
call Mary a God-bearing woman. For this reason Saint Cyril
condemned Nestorius and his doctrine with the following anathema:
If
anyone will not confess that the Emmanuel is truly God, and that
therefore the Holy Virgin is the Mother of God (Θεοτόκος),
inasmuch as in the flesh she bore the Word of God made flesh [as it
is written, “The Word was made flesh”] let him be
anathema.
That
Christ was both God and man, and that Mary was the mother of Christ
as God and man, was not something new that was invented in A.D. 431.
It goes back to the claims made by our Lord Himself. We read in
Saint John's Gospel: “The Jews sought the more to kill him,
because he did not only break the sabbath, but also said God was his
Father, making himself equal to God.”
And we know that He referred to Himself by the divine title “I
am” “Amen, amen I say to you, before Abraham was
made, I am. And they took up stones therefore to cast at Him.”
Not only do we have the words of many of the Fathers of the early
Church that Christ was believed by Christians to be God,
but we have even the testimony of a Roman persecutor of Christians
named Pliny the Younger, who described Christians as gathering to
“sing a hymn to Christ as a divinity,” that is to Christ
as God.
This
immemorial belief in the joint divinity and humanity was threatened
by the error of Nestorius, and condemned by the council—anyone
who believed the error would be “anathema,” a word
variously translated as “damned,” “condemned,”
or excommunicated. Until the most recent one, that was how
ecumenical councils made it crystal clear just what was, and was not,
Catholic doctrine. Please note that the anathema applied
equally to those who denied the divine motherhood of Mary, as it
applied to those who denied the hypostatic union of God and man in
Jesus Christ.
To
be clear, it should be pointed out that this divine motherhood is her
motherhood in time, and not from eternity. Mary will always be
the Mother of God, “aveternally,” as the philosophers
say—an eternally lasting relationship that had a beginning in
time—which began when Mary gave her consent to the Angel
Gabriel at the Annunciation. Needless to say, Mary did not
precede God in eternity.
Just
as Catholics have always known Mary to be the Mother of God, we have
always known her to be our Mother as well. Again, from Saint
John's Gospel we learn that as our Lord was about to die on the
Cross, since He had no brothers or sisters, He entrusted His Mother
to the care of Saint John: “He saith to his mother:
'Woman, behold thy son.' After that, he saith to the disciple:
'Behold thy mother.' And from that hour, the disciple took her to his
own.”
Christians have always understood that Saint John represented all of
us in taking Mary for his adoptive mother.
Today,
in the crowning of Mary's statue, in Catholic churches throughout the
world, we acknowledge the Blessed Virgin Mary to be both the Mother
of God and our own spiritual Mother. For those Modernists who
portray her as something less, I will close with the words of the
Late Monsignor Ronald Knox:
“ They have said that we deify her; that is not
because we exaggerate the eminence of God's Mother, but because they
belittle the eminence of God. A creature miraculously preserved
from sin by the indwelling power of the Holy Ghost—that is to
them a divine title, because that is all the claim their grudging
theologies will concede, often enough, to our Lord Himself.
They refuse to honor the God-bearing Woman because their Christ is
only a God-bearing Man. We who know that God could (if He
would) annihilate every existing creature without abating anything of
His blessedness or His glory, are not afraid less the honor done to
His creature of perfect Womanhood should prejudice the honor due to
Him. Touchstone of truth in the ages of controversy, romance of the
medieval world, she has not lost with the rise of new devotions, any
fragment of her ancient glory. Other lights may glow and dim as
the centuries pass, she cannot suffer change; and when a Catholic
ceases to honor her, he ceases to be a Catholic.”
May
God forbid that any of us should ever do such a thing!
NOTES: