Ordinary of the Mass
Mass Text - Latin
Mass Text - English
“Go ye into
the whole world, and preach the gospel to every creature.”
Over a hundred years ago, on the
birthday feast of our Lady, September 8, 1907, Pope Pius X, issued the
encyclical Pascendi Dominici gregis, condemning the heresy called
“modernism.” The Holy Father identified this “modernism” as being
“agnostic,” “immanentist,” and “evolutionist.”
This can be reduced to saying that the modernist believes not in anything
that he can’t touch and feel and experience in the material world; that the
world is in a constant state of change and development; and that all
religious beliefs are mere sentiments, opinions, or aspirations, real only
in the mind of the believer.
At first, the Church was quite
serious about keeping modernists out of positions where they could teach
such errors—just about everyone in the hierarchy or in Catholic education
was required to take an Oath Against Modernism,
[3]
and there were supposed to be diocesan “Councils of Vigilance” to root out
any occurrences of modernism at the local level.
But over the years the enthusiasm for “vigilance” wore thin, particularly in
our morally lax culture, and modernism took a greater and greater hold on
the Church.
Modern philosophy denied the
possibility of knowing the truth, “for every observer views the same thing
from a slightly different background and point of view.” The closest thing
to truth was produced by “dialogue” about the thing in question, but that
was okay because “everyone” was starting to believe in evolution and its
constant change. In recent years, modernists are beginning to believe that
they can restructure reality itself, merely by agreeing upon a new reality.
Among some in the Church today, things that used to be sins are now to be
celebrated! They have become “politically correct.”
I mention this today because there
is probably no better example of a Gospel that the modernists would consider
politically incorrect. The Apostles were to go
everywhere, without exception. They were to teach the Gospel without
dialogue or discussion—Saint Matthew has: “Teaching them to observe all
things whatsoever I have commanded you….”
And the penalty for disbelief in that Gospel would be eternal condemnation.
Jesus did not
say: “teach all nations except the Jews because they have Moses and the
Prophets.” He did not make exception for the people of India and Tibet
“because they have the Buddha.” He did not say: “teach
all nations except the Arabs, because Mohammad will be along shortly. He
made no exceptions at all. He said: “Go into the whole
world, and preach the gospel to every creature.”
Jesus certainly did not say that
there were a number of Gospels from which to choose! At that point the
Gospel was not written down and published in a book—it was simply “all
things whatsoever” that Jesus had commanded. Jesus, who was God, the Son of
God, could teach nothing that wasn’t the embodiment of truth.
Nor was the truth of Jesus Christ
something that would change with the passing years: “Heaven and earth shall
pass away, but my words shall not pass away.”
“I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No man cometh to the Father, but
by me.”
Can you believe the audacity of
Jesus Christ? Can you imagine how limited His career would be in the
modernist Church? “He that believes and is baptized, shall be saved: but he
that believes not shall be condemned.
How incredibly intolerant!! How anti-ecumenical!! Almost as insensitive as
telling those various people to go and “sin no more”!! Who did He think He
was, telling people what they should do? The answer is that He was the Son
of God—Truth Incarnate.
He was the Son of God, who proved
His authority by His wisdom and His miracles. He walked on water, turned it
into wine, cured the sick, and raised the dead—including Himself! And His
ministers did “take up serpents; and drink deadly things, and did lay their
hands upon the sick, and they did recover.”
Those who question why such “flashy” miracles are rarely found today were
answered centuries ago by Pope Gregory the Great:
...[miracles] were necessary
in the beginning of the Church, for, in order that faith might
grow, it required miracles to cherish it withal; just as when we
plant shrubs, we water them until we see them thrive in the
ground, and as soon as they are well rooted we cease our
irrigation.
But even Pope Gregory was a little
off in saying that—for the Church has never been entirely without miracles.
The biographies of the saints are filled with them. Even in our own era we
have miracles. Thousands of cures have been reported at Lourdes (although
the Church is extremely cautious about calling them miracles). At Fatima,
tens of thousands witnessed the miracle of the Sun, including one who
described it in the anti-clerical Portuguese newspaper, O Século,
among other accounts in secular journals.
Padre Pio’s entire life was a miracle, and countless testimonials recount
miracles worked through his intercession.
Yet, the greatest miracle is the
Church itself. It has had its share of saints and miracle workers, but it
has also survived many sinners, heretics and opportunists—even in high
positions. Miraculously, the Church will survive modernism—for modernists
are small men with muddled thinking, their minds clouded by their lusts.
The Church will survive modernism because Jesus Christ is not at all
politically correct, and He has promised to be with us for “all days, even
to the consummation of the world.”